ПРОЦЕДУРА РАССМОТРЕНИЯ СУДЕБНЫМИ ИНСТАНЦИЯМИ ЖАЛОБ НА ОТКАЗ НАЧАТЬ УГОЛОВНОЕ ПРЕСЛЕДОВАНИЕ

Authors

  • Борис, Балкан Владимир Сосна Author

Keywords:

complaint, petition, denunciation, anonymous denunciation, criminal prosecution authority, criminal prosecution officer, executor, motivated decision, torture

Abstract

The article highlights theprocedurefor handling complaints and denunciations to criminalprosecution authorities, the procedure for appealing the decisions of the criminal investigation bodies on refusal to issue a resolution on the initiation of criminal prosecution, including to judicial instances. Consideration by courts of complaints of refusal to initiate criminal prosecution is a very important aspect in the protection of citizens, since such refusal prevents the person whose rights are violated to effectively protect them. The relevance of the topic is conditioned by the contradictory nature of the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Moldova regulating the procedure for considering complaints about the refusals of the criminal prosecution authorities to initiate criminal prosecution. Th is article was prepared by the Institute for Democracy (Moldova). Th is article is funded by the European Union (European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights). Opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily represent those of the European Union.

Author Biography

  • Борис, Балкан Владимир Сосна

    Сосна Борис - доктор права, и.о. профессора Европейского университета Молдовы; Балкан Владимир - доктор (Honores causa)

Published

2018-05-07

Issue

Section

ТЕОРІЯ, ІСТОРІЯ ДЕРЖАВИ І ПРАВА. КОНСТИТУЦІЙНЕ ПРАВО

How to Cite

Сосна, Б. Б. В. (2018). ПРОЦЕДУРА РАССМОТРЕНИЯ СУДЕБНЫМИ ИНСТАНЦИЯМИ ЖАЛОБ НА ОТКАЗ НАЧАТЬ УГОЛОВНОЕ ПРЕСЛЕДОВАНИЕ. SUPREMANCE OF LAW, 2, 25-36. https://sd-vp.info/index.php/journal/article/view/sosna-2018-2