ПРИНЯТИЕ РЕШЕНИЯ О ПРОВЕДЕНИИ ОДНОВРЕМЕННОГО ДОПРОСА НЕСКОЛЬКИХ УЖЕ ДОПРОШЕННЫХ ЛИЦ (ОЧНОЙ СТАВКИ)
Keywords:
simultaneous interrogation, confrontation, evidence, false testimony, psychological impactAbstract
The ideas about the tasks that can be solved through confrontation, formed over the years, have been analyzed. The article formulates and substantiates the provisions that the existing interpretation of the essence of confrontation and a number of its tasks does not correspond to the modern conditions of legal regulation of pre-trial investigation. It is emphasized that the decision to conduct the simultaneous interrogation of several persons already interrogated (face-to-face confrontation) should be focused on the psychological influence of a conscientious person on an insincere participant in order to eliminate discrepancies in their testimony. Attention is drawn to the fact that such a decision is made in conditions of tactical risk. It is proposed to clarify the wording of Part 9 of Art. 224 PDA of Ukraine.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.